We improve the quality, consistency, cost, and reliability of your LLM-powered features—so outputs are measurable, predictable, and ready for production workflows.
Built by a software house focused on practical delivery, not trial-and-error prompt tweaks.
This service is ideal when you already have an LLM feature (or prototype) but results are inconsistent, expensive, or hard to trust.
Outputs vary too much for real workflows (tone, format, accuracy, completeness)
Hallucinations or incorrect answers create risk and user distrust
Latency is too high for a good product experience
Cost per request is growing as usage scales
You need measurable performance and repeatable testing before rollout
You're considering fine-tuning but aren't sure it's worth it
We focus on the levers that improve production performance—not just "better prompts."
The fastest way to improve output is to measure it properly.
Use-case test sets: representative inputs from real workflows
Scoring criteria: what "good" means (accuracy, completeness, format, safety)
Failure analysis: identify patterns behind bad outputs
Regression checks: prevent quality drops after changes
Iteration loop: improve outputs with measurable before/after results
Test sets aligned to real workflows
Scoring rules for format, accuracy, completeness, and safety
Before/after benchmarks for every improvement cycle
Regression checks to prevent quality drops after changes
We optimize in a structured way so improvements are measurable and repeatable.
Review the feature, workflow, prompt structure, costs, and current failure cases.
Build evaluation inputs and define measurable performance criteria.
Improve output structure, reliability controls, and context strategy.
Validate improvements and establish repeatable testing for future iterations.
Recommend fine-tuning only when it will clearly outperform other approaches.
Deliverables vary by scope, but typically include:
Baseline assessment and prioritized improvement plan
Test set and evaluation criteria aligned to your workflows
Optimization changes applied to improve quality and consistency
Cost/latency reduction recommendations
Regression testing approach for ongoing stability
Fine-tuning recommendation (only if justified)
Common questions about LLM Optimization & Evaluation
No. Prompt improvements can help, but we also focus on structured outputs, validation, grounding where needed, cost/latency control, and measurable evaluation.
Yes. We reduce hallucinations by grounding responses where needed, using constraints and validations, and defining safe fallback behavior.
Fine-tuning makes sense when you have enough high-quality examples, stable objectives, and clear evidence it will outperform optimization and retrieval approaches.
Yes. We can optimize live systems with phased changes and measurable regression checks to avoid disrupting users.
Tell us about your needs, and we’ll build the right solution for you.
© SiGi 2014-2025. All rights reserved
© SiGi 2014-2025. All rights reserved