Hire QA engineers to reduce regressions, improve release confidence, and create repeatable testing coverage. Our QA embeds into your workflow so quality becomes part of delivery—not a last-minute gate.
Quality improvement shows up in fewer escaped bugs, fewer hotfixes, and smoother releases.
Case snapshots, testimonials, and before/after comparisons will be displayed here.
Teams typically hire QA engineers when:
Regressions are frequent and releases feel risky
Testing happens too late and bugs pile up near launch
Developers are testing their own work without enough coverage
You need faster delivery but quality is slipping
Automation exists but is flaky or doesn't provide confidence
You need structured test cases and repeatable release validation
You want clear visibility into quality risk before production
We embed QA engineers who support manual testing, automation, regression control, and quality reporting in your sprint cadence.
Many teams search by tool ("Playwright testers", "Selenium QA") or testing type ("manual QA engineers"). We staff QA engineers across modern quality stacks:
Manual QA engineers for structured functional testing and regression execution
Automation QA engineers for reliable UI/API regression coverage
Selenium engineers for mature browser automation ecosystems
Cypress testers for modern E2E testing in web stacks
Playwright testers for reliable cross-browser automation and parallel runs
Appium engineers for mobile automation (where adopted)
Postman testers / API testing support for service validation
This section supports "QA by tooling" searches while staying readable.
Work in your Jira/Linear/Azure DevOps workflow
Collaborate in Slack/Teams with developers, product, and stakeholders
Align test strategy to acceptance criteria and release risk
Validate stories during development, not only after everything is "done"
Align to your Definition of Done so quality expectations are consistent
Provide clear quality status and risk visibility ahead of releases
Best for continuous quality coverage and ongoing regression control.
Best when you need immediate testing capacity and structured regression suites.
Best for building or stabilizing automation that runs reliably in CI.
For faster shipping with fewer regressions: Developer + QA, QA + DevOps support (stable environments, reliable test execution), UI/UX + QA (design validation and edge-case coverage).
Fewer regressions and fewer "same bug again" incidents
Clear release readiness and predictable validation cycles
More reliable automation that actually adds confidence
Faster developer fixes due to clean bug reporting and reproduction steps
Reduced production incidents and fewer emergency hotfixes
Common questions about hiring QA engineers
Yes. We staff manual QA, automation QA, or a combination based on your product and goals.
Yes. QA embeds into your workflow and aligns to your delivery rhythm.
Yes. The focus is repeatable coverage and risk-based validation—not just running more tests.
Yes. Many teams start with one QA engineer and expand as coverage grows.
Tell us about your needs, and we’ll build the right solution for you.
© SiGi 2014-2025. All rights reserved
© SiGi 2014-2025. All rights reserved